The way forward

In closing, we need a sober debate with a respect for the Scientific Method whereby sceptical true-scientists are heard. We need true-scientists to debate the science so we can be sure the way forward is correct, or the best possible way, and not a construct of some authoritative regime which seeks to dictate how we will live our lives; as servants to an oligarchy of Green elites.

Further, ordinary citizens should not be criticised for being sceptical and denigrated as ‘extremists’. If governments demand of us a fundamental change to the way in which we live, in ways that would impact us greatly, then governments should not expect us to be unquestioning.

On the contrary, they should expect exactly the opposite and be prepared to answer those challenges in a timely, professional and informative manner!

When our current President calls honest citizens ‘Flat-Earth extremists’ just because they have the temerity to challenge President Obama’s claims of impending doom, then there is a real arrogance displayed on his part and of his Green masters. This makes me, and I submit, most thinking citizens recoil from such rhetoric which promotes a green activist agenda.

We must be aware that listening to only the funding seeking pseudo-scientist is dangerous to our freedoms, prosperity and even our lives. We have the choice to continue to live in freedom, to question authority, or have our blue planet enslaved in Green chains. Dangerous times indeed!

• A trial without a defence – is a sham!

• Business without competition – is a monopoly!

• Science without debate – is propaganda!

Author:

James Isanhart currently resides in the Tampa, Florida. Most of his career has been in the environmental business as a consultant to large and small business; helping to minimize the generation of hazardous and toxic waste materials. He writes from time to time on issues which interest him.