TSA Moves Dangerous Body Scanners to Smaller Airports

October 29, 2012

29 Oct (NATURAL NEWS) – After months of complaints, negative feedback, bad press and no small amount of controversy, the Transportation Security Administration has announced it will begin removing its naked body scanners out of key airports around the country.

Janet Napolitano, head of the Department of Homeland Security – which oversees the TSA – made the decision in recent days to pull the scanners from New York City’s LaGuardia and John F. Kennedy International airports. 

The question is why. Why did it take so long? And what’s the reason for the move? Understand that the machines are not being retired (at great taxpayer expense); they have simply been moved to other, less busy, airports where, presumably “far fewer passengers will be exposed to radiation,” reported the non-profit investigative media organization  ProPublica, which added that the dangerous machines were already removed from Boston’s busy Logan International Airport earlier this month.

The Chicago Sun Times is reporting that the backscatter machines are going away from Chicago’s O’Hare Airport as well.

OH, THEY’RE NOT DANGEROUS – MOVE IS ‘STRATEGIC’

The TSA’s “official” excuse is that the machines were causing unacceptable delays at the two NYC airports and that removing them is an effort to speed up the lines.

Since when has the TSA given two hoots about customer service? This is the agency that allows its staff to grope kids, grandmothers and busty women, while allowing the criminals it hires to rob passengers blind before heading home to download child pornography. No, some other reason that the agency feels is threatening – or potentially threatening – has forced this decision. Could it be that critics like us have been right all along – that the revealing backscatter x-ray machines actually do cause harm?

The agency says no, that’s not the reason. But when was the last time a federal agency admitted a mistake?

For more on this article, go to Natural News

Also see OMSJ.org-Backscatter

Tags: ,

You must be logged in to comment

Log in